Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Institutional Administration of Crimes in the Field of Public Security and Crimi

Vol. 10 (2023): Dossiê Administração Institucional de Crimes no Âmbito da Segurança Pública e da Justiça Criminal em Perspectiva Empírica

CULTURE, PRIVACY, AND DATA PROTECTION IN LATIN AMERICA: : A THEORETICAL BASIS FOR ONE INTERNATIONAL FIELDWORK AND DOCUMENT RESEARCH

DOI
https://doi.org/10.19092/reed.v10.766
Submitted
August 27, 2022
Published
2023-08-31

Abstract

The article focuses only on the theoretical part of one more considerable research that gathers and interprets primary material about data protection and privacy culture from nine countries in Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay). The data comes from the local statutory law, legal and technical literature, and fieldwork interviews). The countries were selected when having both local statutory acts and administrative authorities. The article’s objective is to formulate the theoretical criteria to interpret the raw material. It fulfills this objective after producing a multidisciplinary literature review of the social sciences, law, and technical fields (information systems and public policies), using small data from interviews and documents. The main result of the article is a theoretical framework to classify the qualitative data to fill a gap in the literature about privacy and behavior. This framework will enable the cultural construction of the data and privacy protection concept in Latin America, describing all countries in detail. The countries’ description must encompass the classification of events and things as tools for apprehending social artifacts and behaviors that the researchers observe, listen to, or read in documents. The article concludes that we can only understand the data and privacy protection cultural concept by analyzing it locally, with acute attention to the context, even when this subject is global.

References

  1. Agier, M. (2001). Distúrbios identitários em tempos de globalização. Mana, 7(2), 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-93132001000200001
  2. Agier, M. (2013). Le tournant contemporain de l’anthropologie: Comprendre encore le monde qui nous entoure. Socio: Penser Global, 1, 77-93. https://doi.org/10.4000/socio.217
  3. Argentina: ARG1ACA. (2023). In: Veronese, A. et al. Pesquisa documental e de campo sobre autoridades de proteção de dados na América Latina: o conceito social e institucional de Privacidade e de dados pessoais – anexo 2 (entrevistas não identificadas) – volume 2. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.
  4. Barth, F. (Comp.). (1976). Los grupos étnicos y sus fronteras. Cidade do México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  5. Beck, U., & Sznaider, N. (2010). Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: a Research Agenda. British Journal of Sociology, 61, 381-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01250.x
  6. Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011). Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1017-1041. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409971
  7. Bellman, S. et al. (2004). International Differences in Information Privacy Concerns: A Global Survey of Consumers. The Information Society, 20(5), 313-324. https://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/sites/decisionsciences/files/files/1172.pdf
  8. Bennett, C. J. (1992). Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  9. Brumann, C. (1999). Writing for Culture: Why a Successful Concept Should Not be Discarded. Current Anthropology, 40, S1-S27. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/200058
  10. Bygrave, L. A. (2010). Privacy and Data Protection in an International Perspective. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 56(8), 165-200. https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/56-8.pdf
  11. Calhoun, C., & Wieviorka, M. (2013). Manifeste pour les Sciences Sociales. Socio: Penser Global, 1, 5-39. https://doi.org/10.4000/socio.200
  12. Cardoso de Oliveira, R. (1992). Etnicidad y estrutura social. Cidade do México: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social; Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
  13. Cockcroft, S. (2006). Information Privacy: Culture, Legislation and User Attitudes. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 55-68. https://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/7
  14. Comaroff, J. L., & Roberts, S. (1981). Rules and processes: the cultural logic of dispute in an African context. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  15. Cullen, R. (2009). Culture, Identity and Information Privacy in the Age of Digital Government. Online Information Review, 33(3), 405-421. https://doi.org10.1108/1468452091096871
  16. Custers, B. et al. (2018). A Comparison of Data Protection Legislation and Policies across the EU. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 234-243.
  17. Díaz-Polanco, H. (2006). Elogio de la diversidad: Globalización, multiculturalismo y etnofagia. Cidade do México: Siglo XXI.
  18. Dupret, B. (2006). Droit et Sciences Sociales. Paris: Armand Colin.
  19. Ewick, P. (2007). Embracing Eclecticism. In A. Sarat. (Ed.). Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 41, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-4337(07)00001-4
  20. Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Nova Iorque: Russell Sage Foundation.
  21. Friedman, L. M., & Pérez-Perdomo, R. (Eds.). (2003). Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  22. García Canclini, N. (1989). Culturas híbridas: Estratégias para entrar y salir de la modernidad (2ª ed.). Cidade do México: Grijalbo.
  23. García Canclini, N. (2021). Cidadãos substituídos por algoritmos. São Paulo: EDUSP.
  24. Geertz, C. (1989). A interpretação das culturas. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
  25. Geertz, C. (1994). Conocimiento local: Ensayos sobre la interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona: Paidós.
  26. Gellert, R., & Gutwirth, S. (2013). The Legal Construction of Privacy and Data Protection. Computer Law & Security Review, 29(5), 522-530.
  27. Giménez, G. M. (2005). La concepción simbólica de la cultura. In G. M. Giménez. Teoría y análisis de la cultura (pp. 67-87). Cidade do México: Conaculta.
  28. Giménez, G. M. (2009). La cultura como identidad y la identidad como cultura. In G. Castellanos Llanos, D. I. Grueso Vanegas, & M. Rodríguez Nicholls (Comps.), Identidad, cultura y política: perspectivas conceptuales, miradas empíricas (pp. 35-59). Santiago de Cali: Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle. https://bibliotecadigital.univalle.edu.co/handle/10893/20226
  29. Glickman, L. B. (2012). The “Cultural Turn” (America History Now No. 10). Washington, DC: American Historical Association.
  30. Hall, S. (2000). Quem precisa de identidade? In T. T. Silva (Org.), Identidade e diferença: A perspectiva dos Estudos Culturais (pp. 103-131). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.
  31. Hall, S. (2003). Questão multicultural. In L. Sovik (Org.), Da diáspora: Identidades e mediações culturais (pp. 51-100). Belo Horizonte: UFMG/Unesco.
  32. Igreja, R. L. (2004). Derecho y diferencia étnica: La impartición de justicia hacia los indígenas migrantes en la Ciudad de México. In M. T. Sierra (Ed.), Haciendo justicia: Interlegalidad, derecho y género en regiones indígenas (pp. 409-473). Cidade do México: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social. http://biblioteca.diputados.gob.mx/janium/bv/ce/scpd/LIX/haciend_justic.pdf
  33. Igreja, R. L. (2019). Justiça, identidade e juventude indígena urbana: Um estudo sobre os processos organizativos na Cidade do México. Anuário Antropológico, 44(2), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.4000/aa.4011
  34. Igreja, R. L. (2017). O Direito como objeto de estudo empírico: O uso de métodos qualitativos no âmbito da pesquisa empírica em Direito. In M. R. Machado (Org.), Pesquisar empiricamente o Direito (pp. 11-37). Cidade: Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito.
  35. Igreja, R. L. (2021). Populism, Inequality, and the Construction of the “Other”: An Anthropological Approach to the Far Right in Brazil. Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, 18, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43412021v18a802
  36. Igreja, R. L., & Negri, C. (2020). As Ciências Sociais brasileiras frente à ascensão da extrema-direita: Uma reflexão urgente e necessária. Revista Plural: Antropologías desde América Latina y del Caribe, 2(6), 35-69. https://asociacionlatinoamericanadeantropologia.net/revistas/index.php/plural/article/view/151
  37. Igreja, R. L., & Pinto, S. R. (2019). La contribución de los estudios latinoamericanos para la producción de un conocimiento global. In R. L. Igreja, O. Hoffmann, & S. R. Pinto (Orgs.), Hacer Ciencias Sociales desde América Latina: Desafíos y experiencias de investigación (pp. 14-26). Brasília: FLACSO. https://flacso.org.br/files/2019/09/Hacer-ciencias-sociales-desde-America-Latina.pdf
  38. Instituto Nacional de Transparencia, Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos Personales. (2001). Guía para protección de datos personales con perspectiva de gestión documental y archivos. Cidade do México: Instituto Nacional de Transparencia, Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos Personales. https://idaip.org.mx/bibliotecadigital/product/guia-para-la-proteccion-de-datos-personales-con-perspectiva-de-gestion-documental-y-archivos
  39. Kant de Lima, R. (2008). Ensaios de Antropologia e de Direito: Acesso à justiça e processos institucionais de administração de conflitos e produção da verdade jurídica em uma perspectiva comparada. Rio de Janeiro: Lúmen Júris.
  40. Kuner, C. (2011). Regulation of Transborder Data Flows under Data Protection and Privacy Law: Past, Present and Future. OECD Digital Economy Papers 187. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg0s2fk315f-en
  41. Kuper, A. (1999). Culture: The Anthropologists’ Account. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  42. Kuper, A. (2017). The Reinvention of Primitive Society: Transformation of a Myth. Abingdon, Oxon e Nova Iorque: Routledge.
  43. Kymlicka, W. (2003). La política vernácula: Nacionalismo, multiculturalismo y ciudadanía. Barcelona: Paidós.
  44. Lamont, M. (2001). Culture and Identity. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory (pp. 171-186). Nova Iorque: Springer.
  45. Lamont, M., Beljean, S., & Clair, M. (2014). What is Missing? Cultural Processes and Causal Pathways to Inequality. Socio-Economic Review, 12(4), 573-608. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu011
  46. Lechner, F. J., & Boli, J. (2015). General Introduction. In F. J. Lechner, & J. Boli (Eds.), The Globalization Reader (pp. 1-6) (5ª ed.). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
  47. McCann, M. (2007). Dr. Strangelove (or: How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love Methodology). In A. Sarat (Ed.), Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 41, 19-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-4337(07)00002-6
  48. Milberg, S. J., Smith, H. J., & Burke, S. J. (2000). Information Privacy: Corporate Management and National Regulation. Organization Science, 11(1) 35-57. https://doi;org/10.1287/orsc.11.1.35.12567
  49. Mitchell, J. C. (1956). The Kalela Dance: Aspects of Social Relationships among Urban Africans in Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  50. Moore, S. F. (1986). Social Facts and Fabrications: “Customary Law” on Kilimanjaro, 1880-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  51. Moshell, R. (2005). And then There Was One: The Outlook for a Self-Regulatory United States amidst a Global Trend toward Comprehensive Data Protection. Texas Technology Law Review, 37(2), 357-432.
  52. Nelken, D. (2004). Using the Concept of Legal Culture. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 29, 1-26.
  53. Nelken, D. (2014). Thinking about Legal Culture. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 1(2), 255-274. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/als.2014.15
  54. Nívon, E., & Rosas, A. M. (1991). Para interpretar a Clifford Geertz. Símbolos y metáforas en el análisis de la cultura. Alteridades, 1(1), 40-49. https://alteridades.izt.uam.mx/index.php/Alte/article/viewFile/683/680
  55. Peterson, R. A. (1979). Revitalizing the Culture Concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 5, 137-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.05.080179.001033
  56. Restrepo, E. (2012). Antropología y estudios culturales. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
  57. Reygadas, L. (2008). La apropriación: Destejiendo las redes de la desigualdad. Iztapalapa: Anthropos Editorial; Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
  58. Roseneil, S., & Frosch, S. (Eds.). (2012). Social Research after the Cultural Turn. Nova Iorque: Palgrave Macmillan.
  59. Sieder, R. (2002). Introduction. In R. Sieder. (Ed.). Multiculturalism in Latin America - Indigenous Rights, Diversity and Democracy (pp. 1-24). Nova Iorque: Palgrave Macmillan.
  60. Sierra, M. T., & Chenaut, V. (2006). Los debates recientes y actuales en la Antropología jurídica: Las corrientes anglosajonas (pp. 27-58). In RELAJU. Antología: Grandes temas de la antropología jurídica. Oaxtepece, Moles: V Congreso de la RELAJU. https://laasociacion.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/antropologc3ada-jurc3addica1.pdf
  61. Silbey, S. S. (2010). Legal Culture and Cultures of Legality. In L. J. R. Hall, L. Grindstaff, & M. C. Lo (Eds.), Handbook of Cultural Sociology (pp. 470-479). Abingdon, Oxon e Nova Iorque: Routledge.
  62. Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns about Organizational Practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 167-196.
  63. Stavenhagen, R., & Iturralde, G. D. A. (1990). Entre la ley y la costumbre: el derecho consuetudinario en América Latina. Cidade do México: Instituto Interamericano Indigenista; Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos.
  64. Veronese, A. (2021). Personal Data and Transborder Flows between the EU and the US: Dilemmas and Potential for Convergence. In N. C. Rodrigues (Org.), Extraterritoriality of EU Economic Law (pp. 371-385). Cham: Springer.
  65. Veronese, A., & Cunha, M. B. (2018). Desafios do comércio eletrónico no Brasil: Integração vertical entre fornecedores e meios de pagamentos, proteção de dados pessoais e cooperação regulatória internacional. UNIO: EU Law Journal, 4(2), 73-89. https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/unio/article/view/23
  66. Vittadini, N. (2012). Relazioni sociali, privacy e logiche di scambio. Comunicazioni Sociali, 34(2), 213-230.
  67. Wallerstein, I. (2015). The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy. In F. J. Lechner, & J. Boli (Eds.), The Globalization Reader (pp. 52-58) (5ª ed.). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
  68. Whitman, J. Q. (2004). The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty. The Yale Law Journal, 113(6), 1151-1223. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol113/iss6/1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.