Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Artigos

v. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito

Uso de câmeras e Justiça Procedimental: uma análise a partir da Polícia Rodoviária Federal Brasileira

DOI
https://doi.org/10.19092/reed.v10.785
Enviado
outubro 28, 2022
Publicado
2023-07-12

Resumo

Este artigo analisa as percepções de uma amostra de policiais rodoviários federais (PRFs) brasileiros sobre o uso de câmeras para registrar suas ações, tendo em vista os preceitos da justiça processual. A Polícia Rodoviária Federal (PRF), organização que ainda não adotou o uso de câmeras corporais, é responsável pelo patrulhamento das rodovias federais brasileiras e atua em todo o território nacional. Este é o primeiro levantamento dessa natureza com a Polícia Rodoviária Federal realizado no Brasil, tratando principalmente da justiça processual e de percepções sobre o uso de câmeras. A pesquisa analisa dois aspectos: apoio como boa aceitação, por parte dos policiais, em relação ao uso de câmeras corporais para o controle da atividade policial; e o uso da força pela polícia (dimensão da justiça processual). Os questionários da pesquisa na web foram enviados a todos os PRFs do Brasil entre junho de 2019 e janeiro de 2020. De um universo de 10.540 policiais, foram obtidas 532 respostas. O artigo encontrou uma relação entre o apoio ao uso da força por policiais e apoio ao uso de câmeras. No entanto, esse apoio explica apenas parcialmente sua percepção sobre o uso de câmeras. Além disso, a maioria dos policiais expressou uma percepção positiva sobre o uso de câmeras nas três dimensões: uso de câmeras no uniforme, uso de câmeras em viaturas policiais e uso de câmeras para registrar a ação policial pela população.

Referências

  1. Bradford, B. (2014). Policing and Social Identity: Procedural Justice, Inclusion and Cooperation between Police and Public. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 24(1), 22-43.
  2. Caldeira, T. P. R. (2002). The Paradox of Police Violence in Democratic Brazil. Ethnography, 3(3), 235-263.
  3. Cubas, V. O. et al. (2021). Predictors of Self-Legitimacy among Military Police Officers in São Paulo. Policing: An International Journal, 44(6), 1140-1153.
  4. Culhane, S. E., & Schweitzer, K. (2018). Police Shootings and Body Cameras One Year Post Ferguson. Policing and Society, 28(9), 1038-1049.
  5. Demir, M. (2021). Effect of awareness and notification of body-worn cameras on procedural justice, police legitimacy, cooperation, and compliance: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 10.1007/s11292-021-09487-6.
  6. Eberhardt, J. L. (2016). Strategies for Change: Research Initiatives and Recommendations to Improve Police Community Relations in Oakland, Calif. Stanford: Stanford University.
  7. Esparza, D., & Ugues, A. (2020). The Impact of Law Enforcement Centralization and Professionalization on Public Opinion of the Mexican Police. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 12(1), 104-120.
  8. Flom, H. (2019). Controlling Bureaucracies in Weak Institutional Contexts: The Politics of Police Autonomy. Governance, 33(3), 1-18.
  9. Frühling, H. (2009). Research on Latin America Police: Where Do We Go from Here? Police Practice and Research, 10(5-6), 465-481.
  10. Goldsmith, A. (2005). Police Reform and the Problem of Trust. Theoretical Criminology, 9(4), 443-470.
  11. Guzik, K. et al. (2019). Making the Material Routine: A Sociomaterial Study of the Relationship between Police Body Worn Cameras (BWCs) and Organisational Routines. Policing and Society, 33(1), 100-115.
  12. Haas, N. et al. (2015). Explaining Officer Compliance: The Importance of Procedural Justice and Trust Inside a Police Organization. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 15, 442-463.
  13. Haller, M. B. et al. (2020). Experiencing Police Violence and Insults: Narratives from Ethnic Minority Men in Denmark. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 21(2), 170-185.
  14. Hedberg, E. C., Charles, M. K., & David E. C. (2017). Body-Worn Cameras and Citizen Interactions with Police Officers: Estimating Plausible Effects Given Varying Compliance Levels. Justice Quarterly, 34, 627-651.
  15. Hills, A. (2012). Lost in Translation: Why Nigeria’s Police don’t Implement Democratic Reforms. International Affairs, 88(4), 739-755.
  16. Hinton, M., & Newburn, T. (2009). Policing Developing Democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
  17. Hough, M., Ruuskanen, E., & Jokinen, A. (2011). Trust in Justice and the Procedural Justice Perspective: Editors’ Introduction. European Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 249-253.
  18. Kang, I. (2022). Beyond Street-Level Procedural Justice: Social Construction, Policy Shift, and Ethnic Disparities in Confidence in Government Institutions. Governance, 35(3), 737-755. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12593
  19. Koen, M. C., & Willis, J. J. (2020). Making Sense of Body-Worn Cameras in a Police Organization: A Technological Frames Analysis. Police Practice and Research, 21(4), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2019.1582343
  20. Jonathan-Zamir, T., Hasisi, B., & Margalioth, Y. (2016). Is It the What or the How? The Roles of High-Policing Tactics and Procedural Justice in Predicting Perceptions of Hostile Treatment: The Case of Security Checks at Ben-Gurion Airport Israel. Law & Society Review, 50(3), 608-636.
  21. Jornal de Brasília. (2022, 21 de fevereiro). Crescimento do uso de câmeras em operações policiais faz letalidade cair. Jornal de Brasília. Recuperado em 16 de maio de 2023, de https://jornaldebrasilia.com.br/noticias/brasil/crescimento-do-uso-de-cameras-em-operacoes-policiais-faz-letalidade-cair/
  22. Leben, S. (2019). Exploring the Overlap Between Procedural-Justice Principles and Emotion Regulation in the Courtroon. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 9(5), 852-864.
  23. Lino, P. R. (2004). Police Education and Training in a Global Society: A Brazilian Overview. Police Practice and Research, 5(2), 125-136.
  24. Maskaly, J. et al. (2017). The Effects of Body-Worn Cameras (BWC) on Police and Citizen Outcomes: A State-of-the-Art Review. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(4), 672-688.
  25. McCluskey, J. D. et al. (2019). Assessing the Effects of Body-Worn Cameras on Procedural Justice in the Los Angeles Police Department. Criminology, 57(2), 208-236.
  26. Morrow, W. J., Charles, M. K., & David, E. C. (2016). Assessing the Impact of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Arresting, Prosecuting, and Convicting Suspects of Intimate Partner Violence. Police Quarterly, 19(3), 303-325.
  27. Murphy, K., & Tyler, T. (2017). Experimenting with Procedural Justice Policing. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 287-292.
  28. Nivette, A. E., & Akoensi, T. D. (2017). Determinants of Satisfaction with Police in a Developing Country: A Randomised Vignette Study. Policing and Society, 29(4), 471-487.
  29. Owens, C., Mann, D., & McKenna, R. (2014). The Essex Body Worn Video Trial: The Impact of Body Worn Video on Criminal Justice Outcomes of Domestic Abuse Incidents. Londres: College of Policing.
  30. Pickering, J. C. (2020). Officers’ Perceptions Regarding the Unexpected Effects of Body-Worn Cameras. Policing: An International Journal, 43(2), 390-402.
  31. Rolim, M., & Hermann, D. (2018). Confiança nas Polícias: Percepção dos Residentes e Desafios para a Gestão. Sociologias, 20(48), 188-211.
  32. Sapori, L. F. (2018). The Dual and Civil Military Models for Policing in Brazil. In V. Riccio, W. G. & Skogan (Orgs.), Police and Society in Brazil (pp. 29-42). Londres: Routledge.
  33. Sandhu, A. (2019). ‘I’m Glad that was on Camera’: A Case Study of Police Officers’ Perceptions of Cameras. Policing and Society, 29(2), 223-235.
  34. Saulnier, A., Louis, E. S., & McCarty, W. P. (2019). Procedural Justice Concerns and Support for BWCs: Training the Lens to Officers Perceptions. Policing: An International Journal, 42(4), 671-687.
  35. Skogan, W.G. (2006). Asymmetry in the Impact of Encounters with Police. Policing & Society, 16(2), 99-126.
  36. Skogan, W. G. et al. (2015). Training Police for Procedural Justice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(3), 319-334.
  37. Sun, I. Y. et al. (2018). Internal Procedural Justice, Moral Alignment, and External Procedural Justice in Democratic Policing. Police Quarterly, 21(3), 387-412.
  38. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 555-589.
  39. Tankebe, J. (2008). Police Effectiveness and Police Trustworthiness in Ghana: An Empirical Appraisal. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 8(2), 185-202.
  40. Terrill, W., Paoline, E. A., & Gau, J. M. (2016). Three Pillars of Police Legitimacy: Procedural Justice, Use of Force, and Occupational Culture. Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance, 21, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-613620160000021004
  41. Thompson, P. S., Peterson, B. E., & Lawrence, D. S. (2020). Community Perceptions: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and Body-Worn Cameras. Policing: An International Journal, 43(3), 495-509.
  42. Todak, N., & Gaub, J. E. (2020). Predictors of Police Body-Worn Acceptance: Digging Deeper into Officers’ Perceptions. Policing: An International Journal, 43(2), 299-313.
  43. Tonry, M. (2009). Preface. In T. Tyler (Ed.), Legitimacy and Criminal Justice (pp. 3-8). Nova York: Russel Sage.
  44. Trinkner, R. J., Tyler, T. R., & Goff, P. A. (2016). Justice From Within: The Relations Between a Procedurally Just Organizational Climate and Police Organizational Efficiency, Endorsement of Democratic Policing, and Officer Well-Being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(2), 158-172.
  45. Tyler, T. (1997). Citizen Discontent with Legal Procedures: A Social Science Perspective on Civil Procedure Reform. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 45(94), 871-904.
  46. Tyler, T. (2004). Enhancing Police Legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84-99.
  47. Tyler, T. (2011). Trust and Legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 254-266.
  48. Wallace, D. et al. (2018). Body-Worn Cameras as a Potential Source of Depolicing: Testing for Camera-Induced Passivity. Criminology, 56(3), 481-509.
  49. White, M. D., Todak, N., & Gaub, J. E. (2017). Assessing Citizen Perceptions of Body-Worn Cameras after Encounters with Police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 40, 689-703.
  50. Worden, R. E., & Mclean, S. J. (2017). Research on Police Legitimacy: The State of Art. Policing: An International Journal, 40(3), 480-513.
  51. Zanetic, A. (2017). Ação institucional, confiança na polícia e legitimidade em São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 32(95), 480-513.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.