Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Traduções

v. 1 n. 1 (2014): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito

“Empirismo Crítico” e os Estudos Jurídicos Críticos Norte-Americanos: paradoxo, programa ou caixa de Pandora?

DOI
https://doi.org/10.19092/reed.v1i1.14
Enviado
janeiro 25, 2014
Publicado
2014-01-25

Resumo

Neste artigo, David Trubek e John Esser analisam a proposta de um “empirismo crítico” sugerido pelos acadêmicos do Seminário de Amherst nos Estados Unidos. Através da análise da produção intelectual desta vertente crítica, os autores identificam suas premissas epistemológicas e as semelhanças e divergências com a literatura de direito e sociedade. Por fim, sugerem um paradoxo entre os critérios de objetividade dos métodos empíricos e a abordagem crítica radical.

Referências

  1. Abel, R. (1973). A comparative theory of dispute institutions in society. Law and Society Review, 8, 217-347.
  2. Abel, R. (1980). Redirecting Social Studies of Law. Law & Society Review, 14, 805-829.
  3. Blumberg, A. (1967). The practice of Law as a confidence game: Organizational cooptation of a profession. Law & Society, 1, 15-39.
  4. Boannon, P., & Huckleberry, K. (1967). Institutions of Divorce, Family, and the Law. Law & Society Review, 1, 81-102.
  5. Boyle, J. (1985). The politics of reason: Critical Legal Theory and local social thought. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 133, 687.
  6. Brigham, J. (1985). Judicial impact upon social problems: A perspective on ideology. Legal Studies Forum, 9, 47-58.
  7. Brigham, J. (1987). The Cult of the Court. Philadelphia: Temple University.
  8. Cicourel, A. (1967). Kinship, Marriage, and Divorce in Comparative Family Law. Law & Society Review, 21, 103-129.
  9. Clune, W. (1986, Julho). Legal desintegration and Theory of the State. Artigo apresentado na Conferência de Bremen.
  10. Cotterrell, R. (1986). Law and sociology: notes on the constitution and confrontations of disciplines. Journal of Law and Society, 13, 9-34.
  11. Friedman, L. M. (1986). The Law and Society Movement. Stanford Law Review, 38, 763-780.
  12. Galanter, M. (1974). Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9, 95-160.
  13. Galanter, M. (1985). The legal malaise; or, Justice observed. Law & Society Review, 19, 537-556.
  14. Gordon, R. (1987). Law and Ideology. Tikkun, 3, 14.
  15. Harrington, C. (s.d.). The Political Construction of Law: legal practice and the Administrative State. Manuscrito não publicado.
  16. Harrington, C. (1985a). Shadow justice: the ideology and institutionalization of alternatives to courts. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
  17. Harrington, C. (1985b). Socio-legal concepts in mediation ideology. Legal Studies Forum, 9, 33-38.
  18. Harrington, C. (1987). Regulatory Reform: creating gaps and making markets. Mimeografado.
  19. Hunt, A. (1985). The ideology of Law: Advances and problems in recent applications of the concept of ideology to the analysis of Law. Law and Society Review, 19, 11-37.
  20. Kennedy, D. (1989). A rotation in contemporary legal scholarship. In Jorges, C., & Trubek, D. (Ed.), Critical Legal Thought: an American-German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
  21. Llewellyn, K. (1931). Some realism about realism. Harvard Law Review, 44 1222-1264.
  22. Macaulay, S. (1979). Lawyers and consumer protection laws. Law and Society Review, 14, 115-171.
  23. Macaulay, S. (1984). Law and the behavioral sciences: Is there any there there. Law and Policy, 6, 149-187.
  24. Mather, L., & Ynvegsson, B. (1981). Language, audience, and the transformation of disputes. Law & Society Review, 15, 775-822.
  25. Merry, S. E. (1985). Concepts of Law and justice among working-class americans: Ideology as culture. Legal Studies Forum, 9, 59-70.
  26. Merry, S. E. (1986). Everyday understanding of the Law in working-class America. American Ethnologist, 13, 253-270.
  27. Merry, S. E. (1987a). Disputing without culture: A book review of dispute resolution by Goldberg, Green, and Sander. Harvard Law Review, 100, 2057-2073.
  28. Merry, S. E. (1987b). Crowding, Conflict, and Neighborhood Regulation. In Altman, I., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). Neighborhood and Community Environments. New York: Plenum.
  29. Merry, S. E., & Silbey, S. (1984). What do plaintiff’s want? Re-examining the concept of dispute, Justice System Journal, 9, 151-178.
  30. Morrison, C. (1969). Social organization at the District Courts: Colleague relations among Indian lawyers. Law & Society Review, 3, 251-267.
  31. Nader, L. (1980). No access to Law: alternatives to the American judicial system. Waltham: Academic.
  32. Peller, G. (1985). The metaphysics of American Law. California Law Review, 73, 1159.
  33. Sarat, A. (1985a). Legal effectiveness and social studies of Law: On the unfortunate persistence of a research tradition. Legal Studies Forum, 9, 23-31.
  34. Sarat, A. (1985b). The litigation explosion, access to justice and court reforms: Examining the critical assumptions. Rutgers Law Review, 37, 319-336.
  35. Sarat, A., & Felstiner, W. (1986). Law and strategy in the divorce lawyer’s office. Law & Society Review, 20, 93-134.
  36. Sarat A., & Silbey, S. (1987). The pull of the policy audience. Manuscrito não publicado. 97 et seq.
  37. Sarat, A., & Silbey, S. S. (1988). Dispute processing in legal thought: From institutional critique to the reconstitution of the judicial subject. Disputes Processing Research Program Working Paper 8-9.
  38. Schlegel, J. H. (1979) American legal realism and empirical social science: From the Yale experience, Buffalo Law Review, 28, 459-586.
  39. Schlegel, J. H. (1980). American legal realism and empirical social science: The singular case of Underhill Moore. Buffalo Law Review, 29, 195-323.
  40. Silbey, S. (1985). Ideal and Practices in the Study of the Law. Legal Studies Forum, 9, 7-22.
  41. Silbey, S. (1989). Law and the ordering of our life together: A sociological interpretation of the relationship between law and society. In Neuhaus, R. J., Shaffer, T. L., & Silbey, S. S. (Eds.). Law and the Ordering of Our Life Together. Cubao: William B. Eerdmans.
  42. Silbey, S., & Merry, S. E. (1987, junho). Interpretive Processes in Mediation and Court. Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, 77.
  43. Silbey, S. S., &, Sarat, A. (1987). Critical traditions in law and society research. Law & Society Review, 21, 165-174.
  44. Sumner, C. (1979). Reading ideologies: An investigation into the marxist theory of ideology and law. Waltham: Academic.
  45. Trubek, D. M. (1984). Where the action is: Critical Legal Studies of empiricism. Stanford Law Review, 36, 575-622.
  46. Trubek, D. M. (1986). Review essay: Max Weber’s tragic modernism and the study of Law in society. Law & Society Review, 20, 573-598.
  47. Unger, R. M. (1986). The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge/London: Harvard University.
  48. Villmoare, A. (1985). The left’s problems with rights. Legal Studies Forum, 9, 39-46.
  49. White, E. G. (1986). From Realism to Critical Legal Studies: A truncated intellectual History. Southwestern Law Journal, 40, 819.
  50. Whitford, W. (1986). Lowered horizons: Implementation research in a post-CLS world. Wisconsin Law Review, 755, 767-772.
  51. Yngvesson, B. (1985a). Legal Ideology and Community Justice in the Clerk's Office. Legal Studies Forum, 9, 71-87.
  52. Yngvesson, B. (1985b). Re-examining Continuing Relations and the Law. Wisconsin Law Review, 3, 623-646 (1985).

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.